Bill Steigerwald Bill Steigerwald, 1/30/2009 [Archive]

We Don't Need No Stinkin' Bailout -- Interview with Fox's Cody Willard



Cody Willard, 36, has been causing a stir on and off the Fox Business Network, the upstart business channel that's piped via cable and satellite into about 45 million American homes. It's not because the co-host of the network's 'Happy Hour' has long hair, has his own rock band or because he is the principal of a hedge fund. It's mainly because he's been ranting daily on the misuse of government money to bail out the big banks and irresponsible Wall Street financial houses that he believes do not deserve to be bailed out. Willard, who's been a featured columnist for the Financial Times and TheStreet.com, does his show live in New York City each weekday at 5 p.m. from the Waldorf Astoria's Bull & Bear bar, which is where he was when I talked to him late Thursday (Jan. 29)afternoon.

Q: If I met you in a bar and asked you to tell me what the stimulus plan was all about in 30 seconds, how would you sum it all up?

A: It is the single largest money and power grab by the socialist Republican/Democrat regime in power that we have ever seen in the history of this country.

Q: Who are the good guys and the bad guys?

A: The good guys are the hard-working American people who save and are responsible and have been taking care of their bills. The bad guys are the Republicans and Democrats and all their cronies and everyone else who is putting their hands in all the renters' and savers' pockets and redistributing and appropriating that wealth.

Q: You are famous for being really, really opposed to the bailout. What are your chief reasons?

A: First of all, we didn't need the quote-unquote "bailout," the TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) bailout, the Wall Street bailout, because we have laws in place. We have private property laws and rule of contract law in place, and that is what is supposed to be the driver of the American economy and the American society. Whereas today, what the TARP did was basically create anarchy. It eliminated personal and corporate accountability. Not only that, but instead of punishing and allowing the consequences of people's and corporations' actions to dictate where they are in life, we instead, again, appropriate and confiscate wealth from savers and renters and those who have been responsible and we have given it in the form of welfare to these incredibly rich and powerful bankers.

Q: What would say is the prime cause of the economic meltdown that has resulted in this real or perceived need for a bailout?

A: There are two things: A),it's all the rich and over-leveraged people in the ownership class in this country that are trying to basically hold on to the status quo, and they can do that by causing panic and appropriating your wealth. But more to the point, what has caused the large downturn that we are experiencing is 70 years of policies that have funneled capital and money at below-market rates into real estate and propped up the real-estate ownership class and the landlords of the world with targeted tax tricks. After 70 years, that bubble has popped and what the proposal now is is to figure out ways to continue to keep real estate and housing unaffordable for the average American -- quote-unquote, 'We've got to stabilize real estate,' which is another term for keeping it unaffordable.

Q: And you would prefer that they do what?

A: That they respect contract law. All I ask, all that I think the American citizenry asks, is that if you signed a contract -- if you bought a stock or if you've lent a company money (that went bankrupt) -- you deal with those losses. The biggest issue is that they keep telling us that we have to contain these losses on Wall Street, and the Republicans and Democrats tell us that in order to contain the losses on Wall Street we need to spread them out among the entire citizenry. That's exactly the Catch-22 double-think that has gotten us into this mess.

Q: What kind of politics and economics do you ascribe to?

A:I call myself a 'free thinker' and I hate and loath and will fight till my dying breath the two-party/fraternity/political/partisan system that these socialists and power-hungry people have created in this country. There's no need to have parties. Let's have a democracy. Let people, individuals, think freely and not align themselves with a political party. You're supposed to be representing your constituents and the individuals where you're from. You're not supposed to be representing a political platform.

Q: What did you learn in your business career as a hedge fund manager that better helps you understand the current economic crisis and its causes and cures?

A: Certainly the experience of trading and being a part of that system itself opens up your eyes and allows you to see the machinations that are underlying the system. I guess the answer to your question is, for so long what I see are these regulations and these regulatory bodies that supposedly are trying to protect investors; but what always ends up happening is the corporations that are being quote-unquote 'regulated' end up with too much political and lobbying power. They end up creating policies that are totally counter-productive to the actual regulation idea and they end up creating policies that they are able to game. So what you look at is, the more regulation, the more direct and specific regulation that is created in the name of protecting investors, the less protection you have.

Q: If someone came to you and said 'I've got $100,000 under my mattress right now, what do I do with it?' what do you tell them?

A: I tell them that you put $10,000 to work in the three safest, best companies you can find. You make sure they have no debt on the balance sheet, because debt is death right now. Then you are going to put $10,000 to work every quarter for the next ninequarters, and eventually you will be fully invested.

Q: What will tell you we have hit bottom in this economic crisis?

A: You and I will not be wondering when we've hit the bottom. That's when we'll know we're at the bottom.

Bill Steigerwald is a columnist at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. E-mail Bill at bsteigerwald@tribweb.com.© Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, All Rights Reserved.

RESTRICTIONS: Bill Steigerwald's columns may not be reprinted in general circulation print media in Pennsylvania's Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, and Westmoreland Counties.

If you're not a paying subscriber to our service, you must contact us to print or post this column on the web. Distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc. Sales sales@cagle.com (805) 969-2829.

Cody Willard, 36, has been causing a stir on and off the Fox Business Network, the upstart business channel that's piped via cable and satellite into about 45 million American homes. It's not because the co-host of the network's 'Happy Hour' has long hair, has his own rock band or because he is the principal of a hedge fund. It's mainly because he's been ranting daily on the misuse of government money to bail out the big banks and irresponsible Wall Street financial houses that he believes do not deserve to be bailed out. Willard, who's been a featured columnist for the Financial Times and TheStreet.com, does his show live in New York City each weekday at 5 p.m. from the Waldorf Astoria's Bull & Bear bar, which is where he was when I talked to him late Thursday afternoon.

Q: If I met you in a bar and asked you to tell me what the stimulus plan was all about in 30 seconds, how would you sum it all up?

A: It is the single largest money and power grab by the socialist Republican/Democrat regime in power that we have ever seen in the history of this country.

Q: Who are the good guys and the bad guys?

A: The good guys are the hard-working American people who save and are responsible and have been taking care of their bills. The bad guys are the Republicans and Democrats and all their cronies and everyone else who is putting their hands in all the renters' and savers' pockets and redistributing and appropriating that wealth.

Q: You are famous for being really, really opposed to the bailout. What are your chief reasons?

A: First of all, we didn't need the quote-unquote "bailout," the TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) bailout, the Wall Street bailout, because we have laws in place. We have private property laws and rule of contract law in place, and that is what is supposed to be the driver of the American economy and the American society. Whereas today, what the TARP did was basically create anarchy. It eliminated personal and corporate accountability. Not only that, but instead of punishing and allowing the consequences of people's and corporations' actions to dictate where they are in life, we instead, again, appropriate and confiscate wealth from savers and renters and those who have been responsible and we have given it in the form of welfare to these incredibly rich and powerful bankers.

Q: What would say is the prime cause of the economic meltdown that has resulted in this real or perceived need for a bailout?

A: There are two things: A),it's all the rich and over-leveraged people in the ownership class in this country that are trying to basically hold on to the status quo, and they can do that by causing panic and appropriating your wealth. But more to the point, what has caused the large downturn that we are experiencing is 70 years of policies that have funneled capital and money at below-market rates into real estate and propped up the real-estate ownership class and the landlords of the world with targeted tax tricks. After 70 years, that bubble has popped and what the proposal now is is to figure out ways to continue to keep real estate and housing unaffordable for the average American -- quote-unquote, 'We've got to stabilize real estate,' which is another term for keeping it unaffordable.

Q: And you would prefer that they do what?

A: That they respect contract law. All I ask, all that I think the American citizenry asks, is that if you signed a contract -- if you bought a stock or if you've lent a company money (that went bankrupt) -- you deal with those losses. The biggest issue is that they keep telling us that we have to contain these losses on Wall Street, and the Republicans and Democrats tell us that in order to contain the losses on Wall Street we need to spread them out among the entire citizenry. That's exactly the Catch-22 double-think that has gotten us into this mess.

Q: What kind of politics and economics do you ascribe to?

A:I call myself a 'free thinker' and I hate and loath and will fight till my dying breath the two-party/fraternity/political/partisan system that these socialists and power-hungry people have created in this country. There's no need to have parties. Let's have a democracy. Let people, individuals, think freely and not align themselves with a political party. You're supposed to be representing your constituents and the individuals where you're from. You're not supposed to be representing a political platform.

Q: Did you vote in 2008?

A: Yes, I absolutely did.

Q: Did you vote for Ron Paul or someone else?

A: I do not vote for Republicans or Democrats under any circumstance. They are all part of the problem. I'll leave you with that answer for that.

Q: What did you learn in your business career as a hedge fund manager that better helps you understand the current economic crisis and its causes and cures?

A: Certainly the experience of trading and being a part of that system itself opens up your eyes and allows you to see the machinations that are underlying the system. I guess the answer to your question is, for so long what I see are these regulations and these regulatory bodies that supposedly are trying to protect investors; but what always ends up happening is the corporations that are being quote-unquote 'regulated' end up with too much political and lobbying power. They end up creating policies that are totally counter-productive to the actual regulation idea and they end up creating policies that they are able to game. So what you look at is, the more regulation, the more direct and specific regulation that is created in the name of protecting investors, the less protection you have. There's an article in the New York Times today about J.P. Morgan pulling out their own company's money out of (Bernie) Madoff's company a year before the Ponzi scheme came down, but they quote 'Couldn't tell their investors by law.' So in other words, we protect ourselves from being protected.

Q: Who are some of your intellectual influences -- people books, etc?

A: I love Aristotle. Milton Friedman was a big influence on me-- Um, I'm trying to think of some other different names, instead of just throwing out political figures--. Oh, Jim Cramer has been a big influence on me. He's been a mentor to me. I would not have been able to launch my hedge fund without his mentorship.

Q: If someone came to you and said 'I've got $100,000 under my mattress right now, what do I do with it?' what do you tell them?

A: I tell them that you put $10,000 to work in the three safest, best companies you can find. You make sure they have no debt on the balance sheet, because debt is death right now. Then you are going to put $10,000 to work every quarter for the next ninequarters, and eventually you will be fully invested.

Q: What will tell you we have hit bottom in this economic crisis?

A: You and I will not be wondering when we've hit the bottom. That's when we'll know we're at the bottom.

Bill Steigerwald is a columnist at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. E-mail Bill at bsteigerwald@tribweb.com.© Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, All Rights Reserved.

RESTRICTIONS: Bill Steigerwald's columns may not be reprinted in general circulation print media in Pennsylvania's Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, and Westmoreland Counties.

If you're not a paying subscriber to our service, you must contact us to print or post this column on the web. Distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc. Sales sales@cagle.com (805) 969-2829.



Download Bill Steigerwald's color photo - Download Bill Steigerwald's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Bill Steigerwald's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

Republicans - Ha Ha Ha
By: Daryl Cagle
Slate.com
January 31, 2009

Republicans - Ha Ha Ha - Color
By: Daryl Cagle
Slate.com
January 31, 2009

Government Rescue
By: Nate Beeler

January 30, 2009

Lipstick on a Deficit
By: Nate Beeler

January 7, 2009

Geithners Challenge
By: Adam Zyglis

January 22, 2009

Obama Head In Lion Mouth Cartoon
By: Mike Lane
The Baltimore Sun
February 2, 2009

Bailout Mileage COLOR
By: Mike Keefe
The Denver Post
January 6, 2009

Bailout Mileage
By: Mike Keefe
The Denver Post
January 6, 2009

Federal Bailout
By: John Darkow

January 27, 2009

Banking Crisis
By: Bob Englehart

January 23, 2009

COLOR Unhealthy Bailouts
By: Larry Wright
The Detroit News
January 20, 2009

Unhealthy Bailouts
By: Larry Wright
The Detroit News
January 20, 2009

Welcome Basket
By: Jeff Parker
Florida Today
January 20, 2009

Brace for Impact
By: Monte Wolverton
Cagle Cartoons
January 18, 2009

Brace for Impact COLOR
By: Monte Wolverton
Cagle Cartoons
January 18, 2009

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]