Martha Randolph Carr Martha Randolph Carr, 8/23/2010 [Archive]

Balancing the Government Checkbook

Balancing the Government Checkbook

By Martha Randolph Carr

The Bush tax breaks of 2001 are coming up for renewal and there's a lot of debate over which ones to preserve and which ones to let expire. At stake are the estate tax, which was eliminated, the relief from the marriage penalty and taxes for the wealthier brackets, the relief that was granted on the tax to capital gains and dividends and the increase in the ceiling of the child credit tax.

All of this relief is set to vanish at the end of this year unless Congress gets moving. It can send chills down our collective spines whenever we realize our family budget is connected to Congress moving swiftly.

Most Democrats want to preserve the tax benefits to the lower economic brackets and are wrangling to increase the taxes to the upper brackets. They're using the argument that the deficit has to be paid by someone. Republicans are countering with the idea that the Great Recession is not a good time to increase taxes on anyone.

Surely, there has to be one person left in Washington with a spark of creativity who can think of something else to relieve the deficit besides taking it out of the pockets of Americans who still have two dimes to rub together.

There has to be some kind of balance between providing for the lesser of us and having fewer services when there's less money.

If America wants businesses to hire more people and get back to work don't take the sliver of funds particularly small business owners would be using to do that in the form of taxes to pay off old debt. The increase wouldn't even go to creating benefits for those who are suffering. We'd only be cleaning up the past.

Most of us wince whenever the national discussion gets around to taxes. We don't like them and no matter what political views someone brings to the table, we're never happy about how the bill is being allocated.

The argument is so worn down it can be difficult to grasp the consequences of choosing one or the other.

Let's look at it like a national checkbook where our cousins can sign the checks but our immediate family is the ones who make the deposits. Our cousins decided that another branch of the family tree needed special services and they made a great case for the program. We agreed to pay our fair share to help them out.

However, our cousins took a closer look at our siblings and saw that our brother was making more money than the rest of us and arbitrarily decided he should pay a higher percentage. Their argument was that the money had to come from somewhere and the brother doesn't need it for anything that the cousins deemed as essential.

The bar for what's seen as 'wealthier' has been set fairly low by Washington at $250,000 for a combined income. That may sound like a lot of money but once a budget that includes kids, a mortgage, planning for retirement, savings and all of the basic trappings is included there's not a lot left over.

There goes the vacation we knew he was planning for his family. There goes the new truck he was going to buy for his business. There goes the new job he was going to create at his store. There goes the ample reserve he was creating just in case he has a lean year or two.

No, they're correct, none of it was essential but somewhere in there the one who was actually making the money lost not only the right to spend most of it as he saw fit but to enjoy the fruits of his labor.

The ones who are making more are being asked to carry a higher percentage of responsibility without regard to what they were building in their own lives.

There are those who see the wealthier Americans as getting away with something as long as there's still someone in need who's not getting their problem solved. It's like they're saying that no one's going on vacation till everyone's been fed, schooled and housed.

It's not enough to pay an equal percentage of income to taxes anymore. You're going to have to sacrifice more to make up the gaps for the rest of us.

Let's try a new tack. We can start to work within our means and accept that we will not be able to do all things for all people but we'll do the best we can without asking anyone to carry any more of the burden than we are asking of ourselves. It's downright revolutionary.

Martha's latest book is the memoir, A Place to Call Home. www.MarthaRandolphCarr.com. Email Martha at: Martha@caglecartoons.com.

© 2010 Martha Randolph Carr. Martha's column is distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons Inc. newspaper syndicate. For info call Sales at (805) 969-2829 or email Sales@cagle.com.

Download Martha Randolph Carr's black and white mug shot photo.

Download Martha Randolph Carr's color photo - Download Martha Randolph Carr's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Martha Randolph Carr's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

 Lib  Dead Horse Economy
By: Pat Bagley

August 13, 2010

 Lib  Dead Horse Economy Color
By: Pat Bagley

August 13, 2010

 Con  Aid for the Rich
By: Nate Beeler

August 3, 2010

 Con  Aid for the Rich COLOR
By: Nate Beeler

August 3, 2010

 Con  Stalling Economy
By: John Darkow

August 13, 2010

COLOR Poor Welfare
By: Larry Wright
The Detroit News
August 4, 2009

Taxes COLOR
By: Pavel Constantin

May 14, 2010

Credit
By: Pavel Constantin

August 3, 2010

Crisis
By: Pavel Constantin

June 29, 2010

Taxes
By: Pavel Constantin

May 14, 2010

Crisis COLOR
By: Pavel Constantin

June 29, 2010
    

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]