Christine Flowers, 6/5/2015 [Archive]

Not Buying Jenner's Vanity Fair Act

By Christine Flowers

So apparently we're all supposed to be inspired by "The Person Formerly Known As Bruce Jenner." We're supposed to clean up our language so the correct pronouns are used, we're supposed to marvel at the "beauty" of that Annie Leibovitz cover, we're supposed to avoid sexist speculation about whether the addition of "the breast" implies the subtraction of "the rest," and we're supposed to marvel at the re-baptized Caitlyn's "courage."

Oh, and we're supposed to just assume that Jenner's family is totally OK with watching dad turn into Mama Mia.

But guess what? I'm not feeling it.

After the Diane Sawyer interview a few weeks ago, I had to admit a certain sense of pity for Jenner's struggle. While in no way understanding what would ever motivate a 65-year-old man to come out as having "the soul" of a woman, I was moved by the honesty the former and forever Olympian addressed his lifelong gender disconnect. There was a sobriety and a dignity to it.

But this ridiculous Vanity Fair cover, appealing only to the prurient interests of the same folk who watch "Keeping Up with the Kardashians," changed all that and convinced me this whole event had turned into something that would have made P.T. Barnum proud.

Sure, Jenner's fans and apologists will talk about how all of this will promote acceptance among the rank-and-file public, and will initiate an important dialogue about gender dysmorphia.

And if you believe that, I'd like to interest you in the key to Al Capone's vault.

The highly sexualized magazine cover, with Jenner posing like some throwback Playboy bunny has done as much to cheapen the transgender conversation as the Diane Sawyer interview did to elevate it. Really, was it necessary to show that perfect, manufactured cleavage to tell us that Bruce had shed his muscled carapace to emerge as his, and now her, true self? After all those years of telling us that women are more than the sum total of our lady parts, is this the optimal method of honoring the transition from male to female?

Yes, sex sells. But the price - true dignity - should have been too high to pay.

And even if you don't see anything wrong with Jenner mimicking some Vogue model in an almost macabre echo of his old Wheaties cover, it's only good taste to stop raising the former man to the status of a Medal of Honor winner. There are levels of courage, and donning a white bustier for Annie Leibovitz falls significantly short of dodging bullets to save a fallen brother on the battlefield. Let's face it: There's a huge measure of selfishness in Jenner's transition.

We're not allowed to mention this, of course. We're supposed to act as if "living her truth" is wholly honorable and any discomfort or pain the former Bruce's family might suffer is worth his sexual emancipation.

But take a look at the daughters, who are now faced with a father who exposes his new bosom in a national magazine. Look at the wife of two decades, who is criticized for her less than exultant response to her ex-husband's metamorphosis. Look at the sons, who hear questions asked about whether their father will "lose" his penis.

Out of respect for their feelings, the whole Bruce-to-Caitlyn sideshow should have been handled with some small measure of grace. The Vanity Fair travesty, accompanied by an article from Buzz Bissinger, was as far from graceful as the Kardashians are from the Kennedys, at least the ones from Camelot.

And that's the saddest part. Bruce Jenner always seemed out of place among his brunette, botoxed, bawdy, buxom brood, the classy oasis in the midst of the trashy storm. In posing for that cover and in acting as if his epiphany is the only real and inescapable "truth," he has given all of us permission to ignore the devastating impact that his choices will continue to have on his - I mean her - relatives. And that makes him - I mean her - as egotistical and self-obsessed as the K Klan.

True, some of the relatives have said they support "Caitlyn." But in this society of enforced tolerance, it's fair to assume they had no other options. Who, after all, wants to hear criticisms of a person who is finally "living her truth" and forcing us to not only use her new name but her acquired pronouns?

Not the readers of Vanity Fair, that's for sure.

——-

©2015 Christine Flowers. Flowers is an attorney and a columnist for the Philadelphia Daily News, and can be reached at cflowers1961@gmail.com.

Download Christine Flowers's color photo - Download Christine Flowers's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Christine Flowers's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

Bruce Jenner COLOR
By: Rick McKee

June 2, 2015

Bruce Jenner
By: Rick McKee

June 2, 2015

Caitlyn Jenner
By: Nate Beeler

June 4, 2015

Caitlyn Jenner COLOR
By: Nate Beeler

June 4, 2015

The Ascent of Bruce - COLOR
By: Taylor Jones

April 30, 2015

The Ascent of Bruce
By: Taylor Jones

April 30, 2015

Caitlyn Bruce JennerCOLOR
By: Bob Englehart

June 3, 2015

Caitlyn Bruce Jenner
By: Bob Englehart

June 3, 2015
  

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]