Tina Dupuy Tina Dupuy, 3/20/2012 [Archive]

Purpose Driven Lies and Gender Equality

Purpose Driven Lies and Gender Equality

By Tina Dupuy

What does a government bureaucrat being between you and your doctor look like? That was the go-to canard to scare Americans away from the health care reform bill (or single payer for that matter). So, imagine your doctor deciding he or she doesn't want you to get a procedure. They don't agree with it for whatever reason. Your doctor happily lies to you. Tells you — you don't need it — everything is fine. You find out later your doctor, with political motivations, omitted facts from you, and your decisions based on what you thought was full information, later caused problems with your health.

What precipitated your doctor's reckless and unethical behavior? A group of lawmakers decided you don't have a right to know the truth about your medical condition so therefore a doctor's fabrications cannot be grounds for a lawsuit.

Your doctors and those lawmakers have decided they know what's best for you. And you have no recourse whatsoever.

Would you feel conspired against by your state legislature and your health care provider? Yes. And this is exactly what women of child bearing age are facing on a state level: making it okay to lie to pregnant women if it potentially avoids an abortion.

Both Arizona and Kansas are considering bills giving your doctor the legal authority to withhold potentially crucial information about your health, and in this case your child's.

This idea of lying to women has been in the quiver of the our-choice-for-you movement since before Roe v. Wade when abortion was legal only at the state level. In 1967, the first of what are now known as crisis pregnancy centers or fake abortion clinics was opened by a man named Robert Pearson in Hawaii. The blueprint for these ruses is still The Pearson Foundation's manual, "How to Start and Operate Your Own Pro-Life Outreach Crisis Pregnancy Center," published in 1984. Pearson writes, "Obviously, we're fighting Satan. A killer, who in this case is the girl who wants to kill her baby, has no right to information that will help her kill her baby."

In this case, Satan is a girl.

And Satan, being the father of all lies and all — doesn't have the right to the truth when he gets knocked up.

In the right-wing-maligned health care reform bill were strides for women's health, equality and autonomy. The buried lede about Obamacare is it forced insurance companies not to treat a womb as a preexisting condition. Recently it came to focus (while being declared a war on religion) that birth control must be covered by insurance even if the employer is a religious institution (the exception being an actual church). For the last decade, Viagra was covered by insurance, no problem, and the pill was not. A dysfunction for men was covered and a function for women was out-of-pocket. The Affordable Care Act changed that.

And the right-wing opposes this as a "government takeover of health care." But when they want to endow your doctor with the ability to dictate their values in the form of dishonesty — health care (specifically women's) needs to be taken over by government. Stat!

As a culture, would we tolerate this if it were any other medical condition besides pregnancy? What if your doctor was being paid by the soft drink industry to tell you your obesity isn't from your five liter a day habit? What if your doctor didn't approve of vaccinations and you actually get Meningitis? What if your doctor thought it wasn't right to tell you about your cancer screening results while in its operable window? And what if some yahoo state lawmakers decided - against all ethics and medical research - to agree with your quack doctor?

If those things seem outrageous then lying to pregnant women has to be too. If we want to live in a society where women have the same rights as men, being of child-bearing ability can't be a caveat to equality.

Either women have equal rights under the law or they're public incubators. And according to these attempted laws in Arizona and Kansas — we're not equal.

-----

©Copyright 2012 TinaDupuy.com, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.

Tina Dupuy is an award-winning writer and the managing editor of Crooks and Liars. Tina can be reached at tinadupuy@yahoo.com.

This column has been edited by the author. Representations of fact and opinions are solely those of the author.




Download Tina Dupuy's color photo - Download Tina Dupuy's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Tina Dupuy's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

War on Women
By: Adam Zyglis

February 23, 2012

 Lib  Contraception Debate
By: Adam Zyglis

March 6, 2012

Santorum marches on
By: Taylor Jones

March 1, 2012

Santorum marches on - COLOR
By: Taylor Jones

March 1, 2012

Santorum pill BW
By: John Cole

February 19, 2012

Santorum pill COLOR
By: John Cole

February 19, 2012

 Lib  Courting The Women Vote
By: Jeff Parker
Florida Today
February 21, 2012

 Lib  Courting The Women Vote COLOR
By: Jeff Parker
Florida Today
February 21, 2012

Surprise
By: Bill Day

March 13, 2012

Surprise
By: Bill Day

March 13, 2012

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]