Michael Shannon, 5/20/2015 [Archive]

Does This Ballistic Vest Make Me Look Fat?

By Michael Shannon

Developments on the women—in—combat front are cause for concern, even for leftists that have made cognitive dissonance a way of life, because the women don't seem to be holding up their end of the ideological bargain.

If Ranger Sgt. Rosie Riveter is going to be leaping out of aircraft and getting paid to put an end to ISIS misogynists — either by a well—placed burst from her rifle or silently dispatching him with the Camel Clutch (first made famous by the Iron Sheik) — it would be a big help if she'd quit complaining about her shoes.

I was under the impression that if a shoe didn't hurt a female wasn't interested in wearing it, but evidently that's not the case. Females deployed in Afghanistan are complaining they lack access to combat boots designed especially for them.

This is where the dissonance really bites.

Feminists believe "gender" is a social construct, and that men and women are interchangeable. Lefty women, secure in Washington think tanks, contend that denying other women the opportunity to be killed on the front line is patriarchal discrimination.

Meanwhile women actually in the Army are hoping for something a little more strappy with a semi—open toe.

Even in branches of the service that have essentially struck their colors, women aren't happy about equality. The Washington Times quotes a middie (maybe widdie?) at the Naval Academy unhappy that the unisex unis "make women look like men."

Navy Sec. Ray Mabus — no doubt wondering if women are ever happy — replied there are "skirt options on a bunch of women uniforms," which didn't earn him any points either.

The idea behind uniforms is the clothing exhibits, here's that word again, uniformity. If everyone is accessorizing their look depending on circumstances you no longer have a military, you have a pride parade.

Although women's slacks have a certain amount of variety when it comes to placement, for men zippers need to be in the front. That goes for the rest of the clothing designs. Uniforms should only differ by size with the exception of undershirts, ballistic vests and maxi—pads. One relaxed—fit BDU design should work for both sexes.

Rep. Niki Tsongas (D—Dr. Scholls) disagrees. The Washington Times reports she is sponsoring a bill that will require the Pentagon to "devise a strategy to ensure that women are outfitted with the best combat footwear possible."

That would seem to fly in the face of arguments from the women—as—cannon—fodder movement that women are just as capable as men. If that fanciful contention were true, then the only difference in the shoes should be size.

But it's not true. The Washington Times quotes a British study that found women suffer seven times the rate musculoskeletal injuries found in men and ten times the number of hip and pelvic fractures. And those figures don't include statistics on pregnancy that, Bruce Jenner aside, don't affect male combat trainees.

The Marines have had a great deal of trouble finding a few good women. So far the Infantry Officer Course remains undefeated. Recruiters scoured the Corps looking for 100 women eager for the chance to die in the mud and could only persuade 29 to give it a shot. Of those 29 every woman failed the course.

The Army, seven times larger than the Marines, found 113 women to try the Ranger Training Assessment Course. Out of the 113 women, 20 passed and began Ranger training. Out of those 20 every woman failed the course.

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, who knows all about photons and nothing about females, is eagerly awaiting the first women volunteers for SEAL training, scheduled to begin after Sec. Mabus determines the ideal length for a neoprene skirt.

Frankly if I were Secretary of Defense it would concern me that the only militaries wholeheartedly in favor of the U.S. integrating women into frontline combat units belong to the enemy. As his increasingly disruptive and damaging search for Wonder Woman continues, maybe Carter should contact videogame manufacturers.

They seem to have no shortage of heroic women with large busts that are ready, willing and able to kick some behind, even if they are entirely imaginary.

——

©Copyright 2015 Michael Shannon, distributed by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.

Michael Shannon is a commentator and public relations consultant, and is the author of "A Conservative Christian's Guidebook for Living in Secular Times." He can be reached at mandate.mmpr@gmail.com.

Download Michael Shannon's color photo - Download Michael Shannon's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Michael Shannon's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

SECRET WEAPON
By: Rick McKee

January 25, 2013

SECRET WEAPON COLOR
By: Rick McKee

January 25, 2013

Women In Combat Poster
By: Rick McKee

January 24, 2013

Women In Combat Poster COLOR
By: Rick McKee

January 24, 2013

Combat Women
By: Nate Beeler

January 24, 2013

Combat Women COLOR
By: Nate Beeler

January 24, 2013

Women in the Military COLOR
By: Adam Zyglis

January 26, 2013

Women in the Military
By: Adam Zyglis

January 26, 2013

LOCAL NC -- GOP assault on women COLOR
By: John Cole

July 8, 2013

Women In Combat COLOR
By: Bob Englehart

January 25, 2013

Women In Combat
By: Bob Englehart

January 25, 2013
    

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]