Peter Funt Peter Funt, 1/26/2016 [Archive]

GOP Debates Aren't Helping Much

By Peter Funt

Never before in the relatively brief history of televised presidential politics have debates been so important as in the current GOP campaign. Yet, through six lengthy debates precious little has been learned.

Consider three issues about which all Americans should be concerned: climate change, race relations and education. The two GOP frontrunners, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, have never been asked about any of them.

Here's the boxscore: In the first debate Ben Carson and Scott Walker (who has since dropped out) were questioned about race. In two debates, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and John Kasich were asked about education. And, over the course of three debates, questions concerning climate were put to Rubio, Rand Paul and Chris Christie. Such random, at times chaotic, questioning produces plenty of heat but little light.

With the seventh GOP debate scheduled for Jan. 28, a few days before the Iowa caucuses, perhaps hosts from Fox News Channel can find a way to deliver more substance. They should avoid the approach taken by CNBC's Carl Quintanilla in the third debate when he began by asking each candidate to name his "biggest weakness." The answers were breathtakingly meaningless (Trump: "I trust people too much"; Cruz: "I'm a fighter").

The sheer number of candidates, coupled with the moderators' desire to be topical and edgy, makes "debate" a misnomer. The events have been more like talk-show interviews, with questions tailored to each candidate — sometimes quite combatively.

In the first debate Fox's Megyn Kelly went after Trump by saying, "You've called women you don't like 'fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals'...Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president...?" By the third debate, CNBC's John Harwood challenged Trump with such gusto that even some Democrats took exception. Harwood asked Trump if he was conducting "a comic book version of a presidential campaign."

Moderators have often tried to pit candidates against each other. For instance, the first question in the second debate had CNN's Jake Tapper asking Fiorina to respond to a statement made by Bobby Jindal about Trump. Moments later, Tapper's first question to Bush was: "Would you feel comfortable with Donald Trump's finger on the nuclear codes?" Each time Trump had to be given a chance to respond — pushing things farther off course.

In upcoming debates it would be wise to avoid confronting one candidate with the remarks of another. Also, hosts should shorten their questions (some, such as those by FNC's Bret Baier, have exceeded 100 words).

They might also consider these format changes:

—Have opening statements focus on a single topic, such as the minimum wage.

—Drop all social media questions. Networks seem determined to prove they are connected to the social media scene, but the few questions that have made it on the air have tended to be forced, superficial and distracting.

—Close the candidates' microphones 10 seconds after their time expires. Such action will finally keep them on the clock, while also curbing the many unwelcome interruptions.

—Abandon the "you were mentioned" rebuttal rule. While it seems fair to give candidates a chance to defend themselves when mentioned by an opponent, the rule is being abused and wastes too much time.

—Use one moderator and two fact-checkers. A single host can ask the questions while two colleagues monitor backstage. For the final 30 minutes, have them take over the questioning, with factual challenges to what was said earlier.

In this election cycle the GOP has already accomplished the difficult task of piquing voters' interest. Now, much would be gained if candidates and moderators put aside the brass knuckles and got down to brass tacks.

——-

Peter Funt can be reached at www.CandidCamera.com

Peter Funt is a writer and speaker. His book, "Cautiously Optimistic," is available at Amazon.com and CandidCamera.com.©2016 Peter Funt. Columns distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc., newspaper syndicate.

Download Peter Funt's color photo - Download Peter Funt's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Peter Funt's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

Trump Improvement COLOR
By: Nate Beeler

January 15, 2016

Trump Improvement
By: Nate Beeler

January 15, 2016

COLOR The Great Debate of 2015
By: David Fitzsimmons

December 16, 2015

The Great Debate of 2015
By: David Fitzsimmons

December 16, 2015

 Lib  GOP Debate
By: Bob Englehart

January 15, 2016

 Lib  GOP Debate COLOR
By: Bob Englehart

January 15, 2016

Trump Potty Podium
By: Gary McCoy

January 4, 2016

Trump Potty Podium COLOR
By: Gary McCoy

January 4, 2016
  

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]