Dick Polman, 10/14/2014 [Archive]

Fresh Evidence How the Supreme Court has Screwed Up Politics

By Dick Polman

More secret money is being pumped into politics than ever before. For that ignominious milestone, we can thank Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and his four Republican-appointed pals.

Here's the kind of magic number that only fat cats and special interests could love: In the 2014 midterm election, expenditures by groups that don't disclose their donors has now surpassed $100 million. That's way more secret money (or "dark money," as it's more commonly called) than has ever been spent on congressional races in any previous year at this point in the calendar. And the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, which tallied the amount, says that we can probably expect dark donors to pony up another $100 million by election day.

Virtually all of this dark money is spent on TV ads, the kind of ads sponsored by groups with amorphous names that provide no hint of their true partisan intent. In fact, as the The New York Times reported, after crunching the numbers, that 55 percent of all broadcast ads in the midterm season have been bankrolled by groups with secret donors. That dovetails with the new stats compiled by the Brennan Center, a think tank which says that more than half the outside-group spending in the nine key Senate races comes from dark donors. And the brunt of those bucks have been spent to help Republican candidates, by a ratio of four to one.

Thanks a lot, Supreme Court.

In a series of rulings that culminated in Citizens United, the five Republican appointees - wedded to the notion that money is speech, have unleashed the purchasing power offat cats, corporations, and the special interest groups that cater to both. The result is that the average voter has no idea who's paying for politics and who stands to benefit.

No wonder cynical Joe Citizen thinks the game is rigged. It is, to a greater degree than ever before. And because the dark money is mostly spent on negative TV ads, further fueling our polarized climate, candidates are well-motivated to remain partisan once they take office. As public-interest activist Robert Weissman lamented the other day, "How are they supposed to get along with the other side the day after the election?"

Anthony Kennedy, who authored the Citizens United opinion, argued for "adequate disclosure. With the advent of the Internet, prompt disclosure of expenditures provide shareholders and citizens with the information needed to hold corporations and elected officials accountable...and see whether elected officials are in the pocket of so-called moneyed interests." (I love that qualifier, "so-called.")

But clearly, these justices needed to get out more. Because in the real world, there are all kinds of ways to hide the identities of donors. Under the tax code, you need only to organize as a 501 (c) 4 "social welfare" group or a 501 (c) 6 trade association, and pledge not to spend most of your money on politics. Under those nonprofit designations, you don't have to reveal your donors. And as a bonus, you can spend most of your money on politics, because the supposedly fearful IRS rarely polices those pledges.

For people like Karl Rove and the Koch brothers, this is a great deal. Lately, it's been an especially great deal for something called the Kentucky Opportunity Coalition. The KOC is one of those shadowy "social welfare" groups, and its apparent sole purpose is to dump $7 million into ads attacking Mitch McConnell's Senate race opponent, Allison Grimes. That $7 million (which will likely go higher) is 28 percent of all the outside money that has flowed thus far into the Kentucky race.

Until some distant day, when perhaps Congress can summon the wisdom to enact disclosure requirements (an effort that has failed twice already), or when perhaps a new court majority shelves the notion that money is speech, we all have to live with the consequences. Which is why dark money spending is expected to post a new record high in 2016 - and, in all likelihood, drive us to a new low.

——-

Copyright 2014 Dick Polman, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia (newsworks.org/polman) and a "Writer in Residence" at the University of Philadelphia. Email him at dickpolman7@gmail.com.

This column has been edited by the author. Representations of fact and opinions are solely those of the author.

Download Dick Polman's color photo - Download Dick Polman's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Dick Polman's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

 Lib  Supreme Court McCutcheon v. FEC
By: Daryl Cagle
Slate.com
April 5, 2014

 Lib  Supreme Cournt McCutcheon v. FEC COLOR
By: Daryl Cagle
Slate.com
April 5, 2014

 Lib  Blessed Billionaires COLOR
By: Pat Bagley

April 2, 2014

 Lib  Blessed Billionaires
By: Pat Bagley

April 2, 2014

The Koch-head COLOR
By: John Cole

April 10, 2014

Chief Justice Magoo COLOR
By: John Cole

April 7, 2014

The Koch-head BW
By: John Cole

April 10, 2014

Chief Justice Magoo BW
By: John Cole

April 7, 2014

 Lib  Supreme Court Decision COLOR
By: Randall Enos

April 2, 2014

 Lib  Supreme Court Decision
By: Randall Enos

April 2, 2014

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]