Peter Funt Peter Funt, 4/29/2010 [Archive]

Cover Story - Updated



Cover Story- Updated

By PETER FUNT

On magazine covers published this week, Hillary Clinton never looked worse and Nancy Pelosi never looked better.Neither depiction seems fair or journalistically appropriate, bringing into focus the power of photo editing, even in a medium that supposedly never lies.

During her lengthy tenure in the public eye, Clinton has been depicted in more than her share of unflattering photos - even without any consideration of the pantsuit thing.But Newsweek's cover image on the May 3rd issue may be Clinton's worst yet.

Pelosi, on the other hand, appears to have been given a full Photoshop facial on the May cover of Capitol File magazine, published in Washington, DC.

Newsweek's photo, credited to Charles Ommanney via Getty Images, was taken at a NATO conference in Estonia, which may explain Clinton's tense expression and apparent fatigue in the fairly tight close-up.It is used to illustrate Newsweek's report titled, "Obama's Bad Cop," or, as the cover line describes the Secretary of State, "the president's steely messenger."

Imagine you're Newsweek's photo editor, with dozens, perhaps hundreds of images of Hillary Clinton from which to choose.Is it journalistically proper to hunt for an image that looks particularly "steely"?Would it confuse readers if someone called "Bad Cop" was smiling?

A full-page photo by Alex Wong, used by Newsweek on an inside page, shows Clinton with an equally stern expression, but because of a favorable angle and softer focus it is considerably more flattering than the cover image.

The very act of snapping a photo requires editorial judgment about such things as focus, lighting, exposure, angle and background.The process only gets more complicated when editors must crop, position, and even retouch the image, while deciding if it is appropriate to the accompanying story and also fair to the person depicted.

The unwritten rule among news professionals is that reasonably flattering images are used when available, unless the subject is a hated criminal.It's too easy to find unflattering photos, if that's the objective, especially when it comes to politicians and celebrities who are photographed thousands of times.

Newsweek's editors seem to enjoy challenging this convention.Last November they used a photo of Sarah Palin from Runner's World magazine on the cover, angering some critics who felt the image of Palin in jogging shorts was presented in a misleading context.During the '08 campaign Newsweek ran a Palin cover photo that was enlarged so much it seemed to intentionally draw attention to unwanted facial hair, pores and wrinkles.

There's been a lot of discussion lately about how celebrities are depicted in magazine photos. Seems politicians hope to look better, while some entertainers are now willing, if not eager, to look worse.In an odd bit of pushback against photo enhancement, Jessica Simpson appears on the May cover of Marie Claire magazine without retouching or makeup; Kim Kardashian is similarly unretouched in the May Harper's Bazaar.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is pictured on the May cover of Capitol File, and seems to have been airbrushed to appear considerably younger than her 70 years.According to The Washington Examiner, the Speaker's office insists nothing was done to the photo, but it's the most flattering photo of Pelosi I've ever seen.

There's no evidence to suggest that Newsweek's editors added wrinkles to the Secretary of State's face for the current cover, but they didn't remove any either.Washingtonian magazine was kinder to Clinton's boss last year, but out of line, when it depicted President Obama in a beach scene, with Photoshop-enhanced skin tone and swim trunks changed from black to a sexier shade of red.

It's unethical for magazines to alter news images without full disclosure to readers.It's less clearcut, but nonetheless troubling, if editors intentionally opt for unflattering photos when better alternatives are available.

So what's fair and balanced when it comes to magazine images?Not much.Photos never lie, but that doesn't mean they always tell the truth.

Footnote: For illustration purposes, a small version of the Newsweek cover may run with this column.Shrinking a photo tends to remove wrinkles and facial flaws.I'm sure Clinton would love the magazine cover if it were the size of a playing card.

Peter Funt may be reached at www.candidcamera.com.

© 2010 Peter Funt. This column is distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc. newspaper syndicate. For info call Sales at (805) 969-2829 or e-mail Sales@cagle.com.

Peter Funt is a writer and public speaker. He's also the long-time host of "Candid Camera." A collection of his DVDs is available at www.candidcamera.com.



Download Peter Funt's color photo - Download Peter Funt's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Peter Funt's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

Cornerstone of Democracy
By: Adam Zyglis

March 13, 2009

New Media COLOR
By: Mike Keefe
The Denver Post
December 9, 2008

New Media
By: Mike Keefe
The Denver Post
December 9, 2008

Most Trusted Newsman
By: David Fitzsimmons

September 3, 2009

Most Trusted Newsman Color
By: David Fitzsimmons

September 3, 2009

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829 sales@cagle.com
Billing Information: (805) 969-2829billing@cagle.com
Technical Support: support@cagle.com

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. [Privacy Policy]